Could the British Government be liable for not providing HM Armed Forces with adequate equipment.?
I know the british army has been short of equipment for as long as i can remember, but the country is now more than rich enough to provide its servicemen with the best equipment. Could the government itself be prosecuted for failing to provide this and leading to deaths from a shortage of body armour, radios, inadequately armoured land rovers, no/ unsuitable fire suppression systems in RAF aircraft and RN ships, the list is endless.
It is about time proper money was spent on the country’s finest asset.
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/index.html?gclid=CP21yvb525UCFQpPQgod-m-_XQ
I don’t see why not, the British Government are employers like any other and should be responsible for the health and safety of their staff.
However, the British Government should also be democratic. That isn’t likely to happen any time soon either.
aircraft fire suppression
|
|
Fire suppression system performance of alternative agents in aircraft engine and dry bay laboratory simulations (SuDoc C 13.10:890/V.1-2) … |
|
|
Development of a minumum performance standard for aircraft cargo compartment gaseous fire suppression systems … |
|
|
Halon replacement for aircraft fire suppression systems (Small business innovative research) … |
|
|
DCS: Black Shark $24.99 DCS: Black Shark offers a combat simulation experience that is sure to challenge the hard-core flight enthusiast. Employing military-qualified technology, it is an unprecedented level of realism of flight dynamics, instruments modeling, avionics systems, and weapons systems like you’ve never seen before! A detailed 125,000 square mile depiction of the European / Asian border serves as the battlefi… |
